According to a Reuters article on MSNBC, scientists have discovered a gene that causes some people to go to sleep early and wake up early.
In fact, scientists have dubbed it a "mutant gene" and even have a name for the "ailment": Familial Advanced Sleep Phase Syndrome.
I'm not so foolish as to insist that such a sleep gene doesn't exist. I'm sure it does. What I dislike in all of this is how the gene—and early risers—has been characterized: "mutant," "ailment," "waking up unsociably early," etc.
This is typical media spin. Just because a gene exists that causes some people to rise early, doesn't mean it's "mutant." Furthermore, waking up early isn't an "ailment," and people who rise early are not "unsociable."
By pinning responsibility on a gene, we arein typical American styleabdicating personal choice and responsibility for our sleep habits.
I rise at 5 AM, seven days a week. I didn't always. Indeed, I had to practice for a few years before I finally got into the rhythm of my "early to rise" lifestyle. For me, rising early is easy when I get enough sleep, and difficult when I don't. Simple as that.
If I wanted to, I could sleep every day from noon until 7 PM. As long as I got my seven hours of sleep, I'm sure I'd feel great.
Unfortunately, though, scientists are making early risers out to be slaves to their genes, as if early risers had no choice in the matter of sleeping and waking.
One last riff and I'll quit.
The scientists discover this sleep gene. In some it causes them to wake up early. OK, fine. I believe human beings are very diverse... not just in their appearance, but also in their genetic makeup, behavioral proclivities, etc. So the discovery of this gene is not a surprise to me.
But scientists (or the media?) seem to believe there is one genetic makeup that is "normal," and that anything that varies from it is abnormal. And because they view these genetic variations as abnormal, the scientists feel obligated to give these variations a spot in the modern book of ailments, disorders, and syndromes.
Why can't a genetic variation be seen as a simple variation? Why does it have to be a disorder? Why are human beings assigned one genetic recipe from which all variations imply abnormality?
Instead of characterizing the early to rise gene as "mutant," they could have characterized it as a "rare trait." But, no. They opted to sensationalize it... to turn our sleep patterns into an "us vs. them" kind of issue.
And I thought science was supposed to be objective....